基于多级可拓的风电场运营脆弱性评价

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.S1.030

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (S1): 170-175.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.S1.030

基于多级可拓的风电场运营脆弱性评价

吴声声¹ 工程师, 王祥尧² 工程师

1 国家能源投资集团有限责任公司龙源电力集团股份有限公司 ,北京 100037;
2 国家能源投资集团有限责任公司,北京 100037

收稿日期:2021-09-15 修回日期:2021-11-17 出版日期:2021-12-30 发布日期:2022-06-30
作者简介:吴声声 (1984—),男,浙江杭州人,博士,工程师,主要从事可再生能源企业安全评价、安全管理、人因工程等方面的工作。E-mail:shengsheng.wu@clypg.ca。

Vulnerability evaluation of wind farm operation based on multi-level extensible method

WU Shengsheng¹, WANG Xiangyao²

1 China Longyuan Power Group Limited, China Energy Investment Corporation, Beijing 100037, China;
2 China Energy Investment Corporation, Beijing 100037, China

Received:2021-09-15 Revised:2021-11-17 Online:2021-12-30 Published:2022-06-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高风力发电企业安全管理水平,利用多级可拓评估方法和脆弱性概念的衍生引用,研究风场运营的安全性评价。通过调查问卷和专家咨询法,构建风电场运营脆弱性评价指标体系;以多级可拓法为核心,建立风电场运营的多级可拓评价模型;并以国内某风电场为例,确定该风电场的风险等级;针对评价结果提出预防风电场脆弱性的有关对策,是我国风力发电企业开展电厂安全性评价的一种新方法。理论分析与实例计算结果表明:该方法能够提升对风电场运营安全管理评价的水平,可为我国风电企业安全性评价的进一步研究提供参考。

关键词: 多级可拓, 风电场运营, 脆弱性评价, 指标体系, 安全管理

Abstract: In order to improve safety management of wind power generation enterprises, safety evaluation of wind farm operation was studied by using multi-level extensible method and derived reference of vulnerability concept. A vulnerability evaluation index system was constructed through questionnaire and expert consulting method. Then, with multi-level extension method as the core, an assessment model of wind farm operation was established. Finally, a mature wind farm in China was used as an example to determine its risk level, and relevant countermeasures to prevent the farms' vulnerability were proposed in response to evaluation results, which was a new method for safety evaluation of wind farms in China. From the theoretical analysis and case calculation results, it is found that the proposed method can enhance safety evaluation of wind farm operation, and provide reference for further research on safety evaluation of the enterprises in China.

Key words: multi-level extensible method, wind farm operation, vulnerability evaluation, index system, safety management

中图分类号:

X913.4

吴声声, 王祥尧. 基于多级可拓的风电场运营脆弱性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 170-175.

WU Shengsheng, WANG Xiangyao. Vulnerability evaluation of wind farm operation based on multi-level extensible method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(S1): 170-175.

参考文献

[1] 李远哲.“十三五”时期全国风电并网装机容量年均增长16.9%[EB/OL].(2021-07-19).http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/19/content_5625854.htm.
[2] 李建林.风电场并网运行安全管理策略分析[J].科技创新与应用2021(8): 191-193.
[3] 车庆华.风电场安全管理问题研究[J].山东煤炭科技,2018(4): 214/215, 220.
CHE Qinghua. Research on safety management of wind power plant[J].Shandong Coal Science and Technology, 2018(4):214-215,220.
[4] 齐海平,王宝存.风电场事故防范与安全生产管理问题探讨[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2018(23):28,32.
[5] WHITE G F. Natural hazards[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974:76-82.
[6] MITCHELL J, DEVINE N, JAGGER K. A contextual model of natural hazards[J]. Geographical Review,1989, 79: 391-409.
[7] GALLOPIN G C. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity[J]. Global Environmental Change,2006, 16(3): 293-303.
[8] YANG I, KIM S, KYONG N. A classification of the wind turbine acciden[J].Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society,2005,25 (4):29-35.
[9] WALLACE J ,DAWSON M.O&M safety at the wind farm[J].Renewable Energy Focus, 2009,10(5):28-30.
[10] 吴声声, 宋守信. 人本管理、工作压力与安全绩效的关系:基于电力企业的实证研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(10):133-138.
WU Shengsheng, SONG Shouxin. Relationship between human oriented management, work stress, and safety performance:an empirical research based on electricity enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(10): 133-138.
[11] 耿志伟, 薛伟, 王海滨, 等. 基于改进物元可拓法的东北林区贮木场火险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6): 90-96.
GENG Zhiwei, XUE Wei, WANG Haibin, et al. Fire risk assessment of northeast forest lumberyards based on improved matter-element extension method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(6): 90-96.
[12] 孙世梅, 耿晓帅, 傅贵. 基于“2-4”模型的建筑电气火灾事故直接原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 93-99.
SUN Shimei, GENG Xiaoshuai, FU Gui. Study on direct causes of electrical fire accidents in buildings based on ″2-4″ model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 93-99.
[13] 郭德勇,胡杰,王彦凯.煤与瓦斯突出层次-可拓预警技术及应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(1):88-92.
GUO Deyong, HU jie, WANG Yankai. Coal and gas outburst early-warning technology and application based on AHP and extension theory[J]. China safety Science Journal, 2017,27(1):88-92.
[14] 谢尊贤,李艳艳,吴晓茹,等.基于物元多级可拓模型的档案馆火宅安全风险评价[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(1):21-28.
XIE Zunxian, LI Yanyan, WU Xiaoru, et al.Evaluation of archive fire risk based on the matter-element and multi-level extension model[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2019,19(1):21-28.

[1]	李昊, 郝均卫, 李文昌. PDCS安全管理模式研究与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 22-27.
[2]	石娟教授, 常丁懿, 郑鹏工程师. 基于BP神经网络的建筑工人不安全行为预警模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 27-33.
[3]	孙志春, 宫广正, 张艳亮, 肖海平, 白翎, 闫卫东. 基于失效模式的电力企业事故分析系统构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 1-7.
[4]	曹勇, 卢云峰, 贺一博, 李明, 刘小杰. 外委承包商安全管理策略研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 8-13.
[5]	张关存. 建立健全企业安全生产责任制的方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 14-18.
[6]	赵亮, 孙魁元, 韩宝虎, 安文利, 李国强. 基于人工智能视频分析的选煤厂安全管理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 19-23.
[7]	石建光. 煤炭洗选加工现状及安全生产管理探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 29-33.
[8]	乔元, 王建立. 现代煤制油化工安全管理体系的探索与实践[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 34-38.
[9]	蒋海夫. 基于实例的煤化工建设项目作业许可管理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 49-55.
[10]	王志忠. 铁路施工安全管理的桎梏及应对[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 56-61.
[11]	李倩. 科研院所实验室安全管理方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 62-67.
[12]	王慧军, 安亮, 高宇龙, 田勇, 郝孟忠, 白爱民. 风险预控管理体系融合ISRS研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 68-72.
[13]	杨小朋, 闫瑞兵, 彭莉莉. 大型煤炭企业事故致因模型及对策分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 73-79.
[14]	尹一雄. 基于数量化理论的露天矿安全风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 86-91.
[15]	曹志金. 水电企业安全文化建设的探索与实践[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 92-95.

基于多级可拓的风电场运营脆弱性评价

Vulnerability evaluation of wind farm operation based on multi-level extensible method

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价